Society development, either in economy, politics, and socio-cultural, with globalise and localism, wish on the better state organization structure to more responsive to their demand and more effective as well as efficient in public service execution and reach the government implementation purpose. That development are influential to the state organization structure, include the state institution shapes and functions. The state institutions which appear as the form of institutional experimentation like council, commission, committee, board, or authority, state auxiliary organs, or auxiliary institutions as the state institution which have support characteristic, self regulatory agencies, independent supervisory bodies, or institutions who perform in mix-function between regulative functions, administrative, and penalization function which collectively did by that new institutions and an institution which be said to be quasi non-governmental organization.

Existence Countryside seen from in perpective of terminologys, economic, sosiologys, yuridische, historical and political, countryside intrinsically is real governance form, democratic, ad for with tradition, his own law and tradition which grow on very strong, and also relative is self-supporting the than “interference” power from outside. Where is value, institution, and mechanism which recognized in custom society accommodated in governance of Countryside; or coexistence among custom society with village. Where is each interaction and each other strengthening.

This research aim to be: first, to knowing and explaining Role of controlling conducted by Commission Service of Public (KPP) to realize service of public which distinguishing Arrange Governance Which Whether (Good Governance) in Malang city. Second, to know and explain Resistances faced by Commission Service of Public in conducting controlling for the agenda of realizing service of public which distinguishing Arrange Governance Which Whether (Good Governance) in Malang city. The Public Service Commitee can not change the public service will be better than before, especially to arrange good governance in Malang. There are four reasons: (1) Not all institutions have regulations of standard service; (2)The government/bureaucracy still place themselves as a one that must be served; (3) The scoop of independency of The Public Service Commitee still asked by people; (4) Very small amount of public partisipation.

Applying of ground of retroaktif in criminal law procedure is one of matter opposed by Lawcourt Constitution because assumed to oppose against legality ground and of inconstitusional. In decision of MK Case of Number 012-016-019/PUU-IV/2006 Jo Decision 069/PUU-II/2004 in the reality implicitly Lawcourt Constitution enable retroaktif in procedure of criminal context. This matter can be looked into as an equity but may not continue to be let endless, see in procedure of criminal there are tendency “ambivalensi’” where political payload will colour and tend to to overrule human right.